3 February, 2012 07:41

http://www.zemtv.com/2012/02/02/islamabad-tonight-2nd-february-2012/
http://www.friendskorner.com/forum/f247/video-islamabad-tonight-nadeem-malik-2nd-february-2012-a-262731/
http://www.pakistanherald.com/Program/Islamabad-Tonight-February-02-2012-Nadeem-Malik-9562

ISLAMABAD TONIGHT

WITH NADEEM MALIK

02-02-2012

TOPIC- CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE AGAINST PM

GUESTS- SM ZAFAR, YASEEN AZAD, AZAM SAWATI, AHMED RAZA QASOORI

SM ZAFAR A LAWYER said that the prime minister sacrificed himself untimely and needlessly. He said that Supreme Court decision is absolutely correct and court gave sufficient time to PM to abide. He said that PM sacrifice is untimely because important decisions are suppose to be taken on Afghanistan at this moment. He said that PM should write the letter to Swiss court and ask for pardon to SC otherwise charges will be labeled.

YASEEN AZAD PSCBA said that in his opinion it will be difficult for the PM to write the letter to Swiss court at this moment. He said that it is difficult time for the Prime Minister. He said that it will be better for the PM to write the letter to Swiss court.

AZAM SAWATI OF PTI said that the plundering has been proven and the national wealth is looted but the PM is reluctant to write the letter to Swiss court. He said that the people have lost confidence on institutions. He said that the corruption is rampant and people are dying. He said that the NRO was signed to protect the culprits. He said that two billion rupees are missing from the compensation money of Bhasha dam.

AHMED RAZA QASOORI OF AML said that the government used delaying tactics at every step of the case. He said that the court is showing constraint on its decisions otherwise situation can deteriorate. He said that the people have faith in the judiciary and it is a huge test of the judiciary. He said that it is true that judiciary is unable to implement its decisions. He said that if the PM contest the case and lose it he will not be the PM any more. He said that we should accept the decisions of the courts and should not give them different names.

–